- It is currently 20 Jun 2013, 12:05 • All times are UTC + 1 hour [ DST ]
2001 vs 2012?
Forum rules
We would kindly like to remind you that due to a request of the Beckhams, pictures of their children are NOT allowed to be posted on the forums!
We would kindly like to remind you that due to a request of the Beckhams, pictures of their children are NOT allowed to be posted on the forums!
38 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: 2001 vs 2012?
She was so unpredictable with her costume choices when she was blonde. Miss that.
- hesheit
- Posts: 750
- Joined: 15 Sep 2007, 12:18
Re: 2001 vs 2012?
missbe1 wrote:i liked the blonde hair...... I like her no matter what cant pick one.
Same here, but I guess we are the only ones.

-

kittie - 26/Female/
- Posts: 1801
- Joined: 17 Jul 2010, 13:49
Re: 2001 vs 2012?
I've never liked long hair on Victoria. I don't think it suits her at all. But she is certainly looking better now then during her solo album era(s). Its hair to believe "fashion icon Victoria Beckham" would be caught looking as dreadful as in the photo from 2001.

- chris4862
- 24/Ontario Canada
- Posts: 2178
- Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Re: 2001 vs 2012?
I voted 2012.
I didn't like her boy haircut.
I didn't like her boy haircut.
- PopIsHot
- SpiceForever
- 24/Male/SpiceWorld
- Posts: 3570
- Joined: 25 Nov 2006, 12:38
Re: 2001 vs 2012?
I would kinda go in between? left is too trashy, right too.. boring tbh
- Toefje
- 26/Male/Shanghai, Antarctica
- Posts: 3018
- Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 16:49
Re: 2001 vs 2012?
2001
her look is so sad and dark now, like an old lady. I really don't like the 2012 Victoria, I prefer her till 2010
her look is so sad and dark now, like an old lady. I really don't like the 2012 Victoria, I prefer her till 2010
-

the boy is a vamp - Melanicious
- 25/Male/Italy
- Posts: 403
- Joined: 18 Apr 2010, 11:51
Re: 2001 vs 2012?
2012, of course!
The NSAIG era was completely fake and so over-the-top, the good/evil-blonde/brunette clash was such an awful idea: looking back it looked like a mask to hide herself while doing something she was not completely in
The AMOIO phase was far way better: starting from the video to the promo campaign and the performances she was always classy and simple.
Nowadays she's a mature woman, conscious of her figure and she's finally more herself.
The NSAIG era was completely fake and so over-the-top, the good/evil-blonde/brunette clash was such an awful idea: looking back it looked like a mask to hide herself while doing something she was not completely in
The AMOIO phase was far way better: starting from the video to the promo campaign and the performances she was always classy and simple.
Nowadays she's a mature woman, conscious of her figure and she's finally more herself.

-

Poshboy78 - Italy
- Posts: 1837
- Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Re: 2001 vs 2012?
Well, actually that 2001 pic isn't her usual style I think. It was her clothes for performing Not Such An Innocent Girl. But I prefer her style now.
-

DannyDirnt - Male/
- Posts: 115
- Joined: 20 Aug 2012, 00:13
Re: 2001 vs 2012?
2012 for sure. She's so classy and ladylike. I'm not a fan of the clothes she wore back in the early 2000s. too skimpy.
- Heather
- Mrs B 10.22.2005
- 29/Female/Canada
- Posts: 22995
- Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Re: 2001 vs 2012?
i miss her original nose. it was perfect and so cute. really added to her youth and personality
- Toefje
- 26/Male/Shanghai, Antarctica
- Posts: 3018
- Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 16:49
Re: 2001 vs 2012?
^it was extremely cute! I miss it too but... If it had been my OWN nose... I would probably have gotten it done too, you always view yourself in a different way, we grew up loving her, nose and all... She grew up with no such sentiments, possibly even hating her nose, as so many people do (their own noses I mean, not hers!). Does any of you like your own nose? *curious* I hate mine 


.
. .They say: "What don’t kill me will make me strong" and I’m not dead.
.
-

RainbowNerdette - Spice Cadet
- 27/Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Posts: 4416
- Joined: 05 Mar 2012, 22:13
Re: 2001 vs 2012?
Remember, that was sexy in 2001.. Oh gosh, she really had every oppertunity to make it big back then as a solo artist. The look, the style, the mature voice..

- Joanhs
- 24/Female/Denmark
- Posts: 5221
- Joined: 06 Dec 2007, 18:42
Re: 2001 vs 2012?
schizophonic_spice wrote:Nah for me you can't top classic 1997 Victoria
Couldn't agree more!!.
The healthiest and best she has ever looked, not gaunt, sour and obsessively thin.
- Mel_C_fan_2012
- Female/
- Posts: 150
- Joined: 30 Jul 2012, 01:48
38 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests



