
- It is currently 20 Jun 2013, 11:44 • All times are UTC + 1 hour [ DST ]
Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!
Forum rules
We would kindly like to remind you that due to a request of the Beckhams, pictures of their children are NOT allowed to be posted on the forums!
We would kindly like to remind you that due to a request of the Beckhams, pictures of their children are NOT allowed to be posted on the forums!
79 posts
• Page 3 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
-

megzluvsmelc - Beautiful Mind
- 26/Female/Melbourne/Victoria, Australia
- Posts: 11148
- Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 09:07
Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!
omg... is this a joke?
I'm just a new forum member, but this is ridiculous. I can care less about their kids, but regardless, this is a fan forum. Their kids pictures are ALL OVER THE NET, so why exactly can't they be on this forum? OMG... they are butt crazy about their kids... Michael Jackson STATUS!
It makes me not want to be Victoria's or David's fan anymore, but Victoria is too amazing to resist, but david.... um not so much.
I'm just a new forum member, but this is ridiculous. I can care less about their kids, but regardless, this is a fan forum. Their kids pictures are ALL OVER THE NET, so why exactly can't they be on this forum? OMG... they are butt crazy about their kids... Michael Jackson STATUS!
It makes me not want to be Victoria's or David's fan anymore, but Victoria is too amazing to resist, but david.... um not so much.
Jelena Karleusa: Image of Perfection


-

LeoGoneWild - Pusi Kurac
- Male/San Diego, United_States
- Posts: 21
- Joined: 16 Jun 2009, 06:43
Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!
LeoGoneWild wrote:omg... is this a joke?
Nope and yes we all know you can view the kids anywhere on the net, that's the paradox.
- Max Headroom
- BANNED
- 46/United_Kingdom
- Posts: 8511
- Joined: 20 Oct 2007, 14:44
Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!
They kids should actually have THEIR OWN forum, cuz they are so interesting! 

-

Geo - HellaGeo
- 30/Male/Los Angeles, CA, United_States
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!
LeoGoneWild wrote: they are butt crazy about their kids. .
The boys are their children. They are not crazy for wanting to protect their children.
Just because other sites have their pictures doesn't mean anything.
Other sites get threatened with law suits too it's not just DD (this is a FACT as I've personally seen the legal document sent to another site a while back). It's possible that the newspapers & sites like TMZ just ignore the threats because they have legal teams and money behind them.
Dennis chooses to co operate with the lawyers and there is nothing wrong with that. It's Dennis' site so it's his decision.
- Heather
- Mrs B 10.22.2005
- 29/Female/Canada
- Posts: 22995
- Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!
Well said Heather !
- Stumps
- 27/Female/
- Posts: 9952
- Joined: 05 Nov 2006, 04:52
Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!
Amazing, with all the warnings, this thread and the banners, some tossers still don't get the message.....
- Max Headroom
- BANNED
- 46/United_Kingdom
- Posts: 8511
- Joined: 20 Oct 2007, 14:44
Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!
Just stupid "no kids pictures" LIke people don't meet them in live when they are on holiday! RIGHT! She's becoming like Michael jackson.
NUFF SAID
- herman22j
- 30/Male/Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Posts: 973
- Joined: 07 Jul 2005, 11:17
Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!
herman22j wrote:Just stupid "no kids pictures" LIke people don't meet them in live when they are on holiday! RIGHT! She's becoming like Michael jackson.
yeah you tell her that when you meet her...
in the meantime we'll respect her wishes - you can find the pics elsewhere on the net


-

Mama Dee - Mother Denden
- 41/Madmin
- Posts: 53213
- Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!
So it's not allowed for people to post pics of the children here because it's an invasion of their privacy but it's ok for their parents to show said pics on national television? Oh, and taking the kids on 'Ellen' to watch Daddy, therefore once again pushing them into the limelight, that couldn't be avoid, right? And bringing them onstage at the Spice Girls reunion gigs?
Other sites ignore their lawyers idle threats because they are so hypocritical, it'd most likely get thrown straight out of court.
Other sites ignore their lawyers idle threats because they are so hypocritical, it'd most likely get thrown straight out of court.
- Emma
- Female/NW England, United_Kingdom
- Posts: 8648
- Joined: 04 Sep 2005, 17:06
Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!
They don't want the children photographed/posted when they are enjoying their time off with their parents,going to school,etc
When the boys themselves say they want to go on stage or they wait to watch their Dad give an interview then they are allowed to.
I don't see how it's hypocritical to allow your children to be photographed when they want it but not when they are trying to have some private time.
IMO celebrities are allowed off time as well. If you worked at Starbucks you wouldn't start making other people coffee when you had just gone to get some for yourself.
Bottom line: the rule is Denden's choice and if people don't like it they can always find another forum.
When the boys themselves say they want to go on stage or they wait to watch their Dad give an interview then they are allowed to.
I don't see how it's hypocritical to allow your children to be photographed when they want it but not when they are trying to have some private time.
IMO celebrities are allowed off time as well. If you worked at Starbucks you wouldn't start making other people coffee when you had just gone to get some for yourself.
Bottom line: the rule is Denden's choice and if people don't like it they can always find another forum.
- Heather
- Mrs B 10.22.2005
- 29/Female/Canada
- Posts: 22995
- Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!
Their children, their decision. Like it or lump it.
- mayarose
- Female/
- Posts: 85
- Joined: 15 May 2008, 21:37
Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!
What a hypocrite!
-

Ringleader - Greece, Greece
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: 13 Feb 2005, 05:18
Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!
*raises a hand* if they're so concerned about the privacy of their kids, why parade them out on the stage of the O2 for three nights running?!?! :lol:
- Satanspuppet
- Posts: 84
- Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 19:04
Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!
why are you people all too stupid to get it? Can you guys please grow brains?
They don't want them photographed and hounded on their down time. Just like any celebrity they are entitled to down time when their privacy should be respected.
They don't want them photographed and hounded on their down time. Just like any celebrity they are entitled to down time when their privacy should be respected.
- Heather
- Mrs B 10.22.2005
- 29/Female/Canada
- Posts: 22995
- Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!
I looked for Beckham on Youtube a couple of hours ago, to see if there was anything new to do with Vic and Dave since I haven't had a proper internet connection for one week, and what do I come across? A video made with private pictures of Romeo at his school? I had to tell them I thought it was plain wrong.

-

TheBiatches - Male/Barcelona (originally from Naples, Italy)
- Posts: 24468
- Joined: 02 Apr 2006, 19:08
Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!
TheBiatches wrote:I looked for Beckham on Youtube a couple of hours ago, to see if there was anything new to do with Vic and Dave since I haven't had a proper internet connection for one week, and what do I come across? A video made with private pictures of Romeo at his school? I had to tell them I thought it was plain wrong.
Someone showed me that too as well as one about Brooklyn. I reported them to youtube and I'm surprised they are still up.
- Heather
- Mrs B 10.22.2005
- 29/Female/Canada
- Posts: 22995
- Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!
Heather wrote:why are you people all too stupid to get it? Can you guys please grow brains?
They don't want them photographed and hounded on their down time. Just like any celebrity they are entitled to down time when their privacy should be respected.
Rude Much?
If they don't want the kids photographed fair enough but you can't send out one message that says... yeah we'll parade them at the O2 for a few nights on stage when the worlds press is watching and then suddenly expect paps and fans to back off.
Send a consistent message. Jackson may have been nuts but he made sure the kids were covered up in public and the paps eventually stopped trying... but that's an extreme.
I don't really care though... I'm a fan of the spice girls... not their lives :P It annoyed me when Emma got mobbed by the 'usuals' at opening night of blood brothers... I had my chance to approach her, never met her but it was her NIGHT OFF... she was there for the same reason as everyone else... to watch Melanie but people just wouldn't leave her alone.
It's not just about respect for the kids, it's about respect for the people we follow.

- Satanspuppet
- Posts: 84
- Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 19:04
Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!
Shurrup or I Keel You Infidel of Brum!!!! :P
- Satanspuppet
- Posts: 84
- Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 19:04
Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!
Can we stick to the subject , Vic is nothing more than a prop on the first hour wearing the red dress . 2nd day is ok so far .
Ps. About the pic's .. If someone who is old enough to operate the internet doesn't get SECURITY concerns , Then it's best to let them ramble with their crap .
Ps. About the pic's .. If someone who is old enough to operate the internet doesn't get SECURITY concerns , Then it's best to let them ramble with their crap .

- Redbull
- 24/Q8, Kuwait
- Posts: 7810
- Joined: 07 Jan 2007, 22:05
Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!
I totally agree with this. If I had kids I wouldnt want pictures of them anywhere on the interent considering the amount of paedos that lurk around. Im not keen on the threads with all the other Spice kids but hey ho not my problem.
PS. Not calling anyone here a pervert lol.
PS. Not calling anyone here a pervert lol.
- jonnyboy47
- Male/United_Kingdom
- Posts: 70
- Joined: 09 Jan 2010, 04:41
79 posts
• Page 3 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4






