• Home
  • Rules
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • FAQ / Contact
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • It is currently 20 May 2013, 13:47 • All times are UTC + 1 hour [ DST ]
  • Board index ‹ Spice Girls ‹ Victoria Beckham
  • Change font size
  • Print view

Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

It’s Exhausting Being This Fabulous
Forum rules
We would kindly like to remind you that due to a request of the Beckhams, pictures of their children are NOT allowed to be posted on the forums!
Post a reply
79 posts • Page 3 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby megzluvsmelc » 30 May 2009, 14:43

Lol! :D
Image
User avatar
megzluvsmelc
Beautiful Mind
 
26/Female/Melbourne/Victoria, Australia
Posts: 11100
Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 09:07
  • Website
Top

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby LeoGoneWild » 17 Jun 2009, 02:11

omg... is this a joke?

I'm just a new forum member, but this is ridiculous. I can care less about their kids, but regardless, this is a fan forum. Their kids pictures are ALL OVER THE NET, so why exactly can't they be on this forum? OMG... they are butt crazy about their kids... Michael Jackson STATUS!

It makes me not want to be Victoria's or David's fan anymore, but Victoria is too amazing to resist, but david.... um not so much.
Jelena Karleusa: Image of Perfection
Image
User avatar
LeoGoneWild
Pusi Kurac
 
Male/San Diego, United_States
Posts: 21
Joined: 16 Jun 2009, 06:43
Top

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Max Headroom » 17 Jun 2009, 22:35

LeoGoneWild wrote:omg... is this a joke?



Nope and yes we all know you can view the kids anywhere on the net, that's the paradox.
Max Headroom
BANNED
 
46/United_Kingdom
Posts: 8511
Joined: 20 Oct 2007, 14:44
Top

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Geo » 16 Jul 2009, 06:35

They kids should actually have THEIR OWN forum, cuz they are so interesting! ;)
User avatar
Geo
HellaGeo
 
30/Male/Los Angeles, CA, United_States
Posts: 1019
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
  • Website
Top

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Heather » 20 Jul 2009, 05:23

LeoGoneWild wrote: they are butt crazy about their kids. .

The boys are their children. They are not crazy for wanting to protect their children.

Just because other sites have their pictures doesn't mean anything.

Other sites get threatened with law suits too it's not just DD (this is a FACT as I've personally seen the legal document sent to another site a while back). It's possible that the newspapers & sites like TMZ just ignore the threats because they have legal teams and money behind them.

Dennis chooses to co operate with the lawyers and there is nothing wrong with that. It's Dennis' site so it's his decision.
Our 3rd baby GIRL coming in August ♥

Image
Heather
Mrs B 10.22.2005
 
28/Female/Canada
Posts: 22954
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Top

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby spicefreak » 25 Jul 2009, 01:53

^ I agree wholeheartedly with you!
x
Image
spicefreak
Enjoy the show
 
25/Male/Leeds, United_Kingdom
Posts: 8051
Joined: 05 Oct 2005, 17:23
Top

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Stumps » 28 Jul 2009, 02:40

Well said Heather !
Stumps
 
27/Female/
Posts: 9952
Joined: 05 Nov 2006, 04:52
Top

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Max Headroom » 02 Aug 2009, 14:26

Amazing, with all the warnings, this thread and the banners, some tossers still don't get the message.....
Max Headroom
BANNED
 
46/United_Kingdom
Posts: 8511
Joined: 20 Oct 2007, 14:44
Top

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby breezyspice » 09 Aug 2009, 21:59

Apparently people only read what they want to. Weird that.
Image
User avatar
breezyspice
Breezy
 
28/Female/Canada
Posts: 10168
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
  • Website
Top

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby herman22j » 29 Aug 2009, 13:48

Just stupid "no kids pictures" LIke people don't meet them in live when they are on holiday! RIGHT! She's becoming like Michael jackson.
NUFF SAID
herman22j
 
30/Male/Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 965
Joined: 07 Jul 2005, 11:17
Top

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Mama Dee » 30 Aug 2009, 00:22

herman22j wrote:Just stupid "no kids pictures" LIke people don't meet them in live when they are on holiday! RIGHT! She's becoming like Michael jackson.

yeah you tell her that when you meet her...
in the meantime we'll respect her wishes - you can find the pics elsewhere on the net ;)
Image
User avatar
Mama Dee
Mother Denden
 
41/Madmin
Posts: 53196
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Top

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Emma » 15 Sep 2009, 23:51

So it's not allowed for people to post pics of the children here because it's an invasion of their privacy but it's ok for their parents to show said pics on national television? Oh, and taking the kids on 'Ellen' to watch Daddy, therefore once again pushing them into the limelight, that couldn't be avoid, right? And bringing them onstage at the Spice Girls reunion gigs?

Other sites ignore their lawyers idle threats because they are so hypocritical, it'd most likely get thrown straight out of court.
Emma
 
Female/NW England, United_Kingdom
Posts: 8648
Joined: 04 Sep 2005, 17:06
Top

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Heather » 22 Sep 2009, 16:44

They don't want the children photographed/posted when they are enjoying their time off with their parents,going to school,etc

When the boys themselves say they want to go on stage or they wait to watch their Dad give an interview then they are allowed to.

I don't see how it's hypocritical to allow your children to be photographed when they want it but not when they are trying to have some private time.

IMO celebrities are allowed off time as well. If you worked at Starbucks you wouldn't start making other people coffee when you had just gone to get some for yourself.

Bottom line: the rule is Denden's choice and if people don't like it they can always find another forum.
Our 3rd baby GIRL coming in August ♥

Image
Heather
Mrs B 10.22.2005
 
28/Female/Canada
Posts: 22954
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Top

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby mayarose » 22 Sep 2009, 23:39

Their children, their decision. Like it or lump it.
mayarose
 
Female/
Posts: 85
Joined: 15 May 2008, 21:37
Top

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Ringleader » 28 Oct 2009, 02:47

What a hypocrite!
User avatar
Ringleader
 
Greece, Greece
Posts: 3261
Joined: 13 Feb 2005, 05:18
  • Website
Top

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Satanspuppet » 18 Dec 2009, 17:07

*raises a hand* if they're so concerned about the privacy of their kids, why parade them out on the stage of the O2 for three nights running?!?! :lol:
Satanspuppet
 
Posts: 84
Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 19:04
Top

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Heather » 18 Dec 2009, 18:27

why are you people all too stupid to get it? Can you guys please grow brains?

They don't want them photographed and hounded on their down time. Just like any celebrity they are entitled to down time when their privacy should be respected.
Our 3rd baby GIRL coming in August ♥

Image
Heather
Mrs B 10.22.2005
 
28/Female/Canada
Posts: 22954
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Top

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby TheBiatches » 18 Dec 2009, 18:33

I looked for Beckham on Youtube a couple of hours ago, to see if there was anything new to do with Vic and Dave since I haven't had a proper internet connection for one week, and what do I come across? A video made with private pictures of Romeo at his school? I had to tell them I thought it was plain wrong.
Image
User avatar
TheBiatches
 
Male/Barcelona (originally from Naples, Italy)
Posts: 24317
Joined: 02 Apr 2006, 19:08
Top

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Heather » 18 Dec 2009, 18:37

TheBiatches wrote:I looked for Beckham on Youtube a couple of hours ago, to see if there was anything new to do with Vic and Dave since I haven't had a proper internet connection for one week, and what do I come across? A video made with private pictures of Romeo at his school? I had to tell them I thought it was plain wrong.


Someone showed me that too as well as one about Brooklyn. I reported them to youtube and I'm surprised they are still up.
Our 3rd baby GIRL coming in August ♥

Image
Heather
Mrs B 10.22.2005
 
28/Female/Canada
Posts: 22954
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Top

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Satanspuppet » 19 Dec 2009, 02:34

Heather wrote:why are you people all too stupid to get it? Can you guys please grow brains?

They don't want them photographed and hounded on their down time. Just like any celebrity they are entitled to down time when their privacy should be respected.


Rude Much?

If they don't want the kids photographed fair enough but you can't send out one message that says... yeah we'll parade them at the O2 for a few nights on stage when the worlds press is watching and then suddenly expect paps and fans to back off.

Send a consistent message. Jackson may have been nuts but he made sure the kids were covered up in public and the paps eventually stopped trying... but that's an extreme.

I don't really care though... I'm a fan of the spice girls... not their lives :P It annoyed me when Emma got mobbed by the 'usuals' at opening night of blood brothers... I had my chance to approach her, never met her but it was her NIGHT OFF... she was there for the same reason as everyone else... to watch Melanie but people just wouldn't leave her alone.

It's not just about respect for the kids, it's about respect for the people we follow.
:puke:
Satanspuppet
 
Posts: 84
Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 19:04
Top

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby [ben] » 19 Dec 2009, 17:01

^ bullshit - you LOVE the spice girls!
Image
User avatar
[ben]
dere n ara deg ata i
 
30/Male/
Posts: 5464
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Top

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Satanspuppet » 25 Dec 2009, 00:34

Shurrup or I Keel You Infidel of Brum!!!! :P
Satanspuppet
 
Posts: 84
Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 19:04
Top

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby FiaSpice » 05 Jan 2010, 21:33

I also re-state: no kids pictures in here please!
Image
User avatar
FiaSpice
Untouched
 
28/Female/Montréal, Québec, Canada
Posts: 16901
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
  • Website
Top

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Redbull » 13 Jan 2010, 07:27

Can we stick to the subject , Vic is nothing more than a prop on the first hour wearing the red dress . 2nd day is ok so far .

Ps. About the pic's .. If someone who is old enough to operate the internet doesn't get SECURITY concerns , Then it's best to let them ramble with their crap .
Image
Redbull
 
24/Q8, Kuwait
Posts: 7810
Joined: 07 Jan 2007, 22:05
Top

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby jonnyboy47 » 29 Jul 2010, 03:22

I totally agree with this. If I had kids I wouldnt want pictures of them anywhere on the interent considering the amount of paedos that lurk around. Im not keen on the threads with all the other Spice kids but hey ho not my problem.

PS. Not calling anyone here a pervert lol.
jonnyboy47
 
Male/United_Kingdom
Posts: 70
Joined: 09 Jan 2010, 04:41
Top

PreviousNext

Post a reply
79 posts • Page 3 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4

Return to Victoria Beckham

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests

  • Board index

FAQ | Search |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Logo design by Charmaine Chan
Style based on "IDLaunch_Black" created by David Jansen @ IDLaunch