Lah wrote:^Thanks guys!
You're welcome!
I don't love the cover, although it's not bad, but it's not a patch on Numero and I-D!

by TheBiatches » 28 Mar 2012, 19:40
Lah wrote:^Thanks guys!




by Jer » 29 Mar 2012, 00:45

by Patricia » 29 Mar 2012, 01:11


by Lah » 29 Mar 2012, 01:12
Patricia wrote:fuck me, that shot in B&W is AMAZING!!!![]()
![]()

by gugette » 29 Mar 2012, 01:24
by Patricia » 29 Mar 2012, 01:28
gugette wrote:The white suit pic is nice. I think it's the same suit we've seen in Numero and the other UK mag shoot.

by zayra26 » 29 Mar 2012, 01:48
by Andre » 29 Mar 2012, 02:20
by Aries » 29 Mar 2012, 02:30
by FrankTB » 29 Mar 2012, 03:19

by Fari » 29 Mar 2012, 04:07
by Fari » 29 Mar 2012, 04:17
by Rebecca » 29 Mar 2012, 04:40

by gugette » 29 Mar 2012, 05:19
Fari wrote:
But I have the feeling, she shot for all these pics at one time and than different mags are using them? If so, how weird. Don't each mag have their own little shoot? Unless the mags are owned by the same company I guess.
by kittie » 29 Mar 2012, 08:01
Patricia wrote:gugette wrote:The white suit pic is nice. I think it's the same suit we've seen in Numero and the other UK mag shoot.
yes, was thinking the same


by Fari » 29 Mar 2012, 08:26
by grace4 » 29 Mar 2012, 09:07
Aries wrote:And sorry, but she just asks to get shit on when she says her body represents the general public. She has total body dysmorphia if that is the case.
by annaNZ » 29 Mar 2012, 09:22

by Poshboy78 » 29 Mar 2012, 10:09


by simby » 29 Mar 2012, 10:23
Poshboy78 wrote:When she's wearing underwear like in these shots or during the Emporio Armani campaign I always notice how in proportion she is rather than skinny :she looks skinnier when she's wearing certain outfits.
At the end of the day she's healthy. And fit.
She rocks. Even in her undies

by khyrull_ridca » 29 Mar 2012, 11:28
the legs and hips part looks it been photoshopped and it seems they made it wider and bigger. In real life she look smaller than that.
