
https://twitter.com/glamourmag/status/2 ... 3343485952
by Lah » 12 Jul 2012, 18:33

by Patricia » 12 Jul 2012, 19:09

by kittie » 12 Jul 2012, 19:57

lynzi wrote:^^^^all of it. some of it. Or none of it lol.
It's just the editor's inspiration for what her shoot was about.


by Aries » 12 Jul 2012, 23:58

by Patricia » 13 Jul 2012, 00:33
Aries wrote:Patricia wrote:so looks like it's going to be red lips, lingerie, lots of diamons, old school glamour etc...
So just like every shoot she has done recently. She better not be in a bra with some high-waisted knickers combo or I will be

by Tony » 13 Jul 2012, 00:47
by simby » 13 Jul 2012, 10:49
Tony wrote:There is an interview with Victoria about the Evoque in this months GQ magazine. See the exciting extract below:
"I am trying to build a serious business and I have to stay true to myself. I have to build this business the right way. I don't want to run before I can walk." Not in those boots anyway, Victoria (they're by Tom Ford incidentally; her own footwear range is imminent."
So - Victoria Beckham Footwear. Imminent.
by simby » 13 Jul 2012, 11:04
by mel2vicem » 13 Jul 2012, 23:14
by simby » 14 Jul 2012, 11:46
by VBIH » 14 Jul 2012, 15:58
by nona » 14 Jul 2012, 20:03

by Lah » 14 Jul 2012, 20:13
by hesheit » 14 Jul 2012, 20:14
by Andre » 15 Jul 2012, 07:39
by lynzi » 15 Jul 2012, 08:27

by gugette » 15 Jul 2012, 14:07
nona wrote:This was posted in her style thread @ tFS
http://forums.thefashionspot.com/showpo ... tcount=887
by grace4 » 15 Jul 2012, 14:41
by gugette » 15 Jul 2012, 14:54
by gugette » 15 Jul 2012, 15:08
by karolie » 15 Jul 2012, 15:16
grace4 wrote:^just sent it
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests
